What happened at Luigi Mangione's court appearance?
Asked 2 days ago
Answer
Luigi Mangione appeared in court for pre-trial hearings where his defense challenged the admissibility of evidence obtained during his arrest, including a backpack, a notebook, and statements made before Miranda rights were given. The hearing featured testimony, review of surveillance, and the playing of a 911 call. The judge is expected to rule soon on what evidence will be allowed at trial, which could impact both state and federal cases.
Now Playing
Luigi Mangione's lawyers try to exclude evidence from trial
- Mangione's lawyers ask to exclude evidence, including a notebook, from trial 5s
- Defense argues evidence was obtained without warrant or Miranda rights 50s
- Notebook allegedly contains writings about motive and insurance industry disdain 1m 9s
- Mangione faces second-degree murder charges in CEO Brian Thompson's killing 1m 14s
- Trial date has not yet been set 2m 2s
References
Mangione's lawyers asked the judge to exclude a notebook and handgun found in his backpack, arguing they were obtained without a warrant and before Miranda rights. Prosecutors claim the notebook reveals motive. Mangione pleaded not guilty, and a trial date has not been set.
Mangione's defense argued to exclude several pieces of evidence, including a backpack with a ghost gun, a notebook, and statements made before Miranda rights were read. The judge is expected to rule on admissibility and set a trial calendar soon.
Luigi Mangione appeared in a New York court for a pre-trial hearing, pleaded not guilty, and his defense challenged evidence from his arrest. The hearing included testimony from law enforcement, review of surveillance footage, and the playing of a 911 call from a McDonald's manager. Mangione was seen taking notes and consulting with his attorneys. The judge allowed his hands to be unshackled for note-taking.
Mangione appeared in court for suppression hearings to determine if statements made before Miranda rights and items found in his backpack can be admitted. His lawyers argue both were obtained in violation of his rights. The outcome will impact both state and federal cases.